From: strk <strk@keybit.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 18:31:48 +0200
To: gplflash-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Gplflash-devel] gplflash2 available via CVS

On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:38:51PM +0200, Tomas Groth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> > 
> > As a gplflash developer, altought still unproductive, I swear
> > I'll use the GPL licence for my own code so let me know
> > if this is OK for you or you're planning to do "something
> > nasty" with us.
> > 
> > --strk(Smelling The Rat);
> > 
> 
> Sooo, you're basicly saying that if we don't change the license for the libs in
> gpflash2 from lgpl to gpl, you won't contribute?

Not really, I'm basically getting mentally unable.
I probably won't have time to contribute anyway, but I jumped on gplflash
because it was *gpl*flash. MM player is getting on my way in too many
ways. I develop free software for flash platform, and I DON'T like
my applications being unable to run on NON-free platforms.

Thus I'm interested in *gpl*flash.

Can you explain once more about the LGPL choice ?
Are you afraid about Adobe patenting the technology ?
In this case, what about assigning copyright to the FSF ?
Authors would still be recognized as such, by both documentation
and visibility on development channels...

--strk;